Instructions Who made a more compelling argument for disobeying unjust laws, Mar

Instructions
Who made a more compelling argument for disobeying unjust laws, Martin Luther King, Jr. in his “Letter from a Birmingham Jail” or Henry David Thoreau in “Civil Disobedience?”
In supporting your choice, you may address the authors’ use of ethos, pathos, or logos, or any combination of the three.
Note: This does not have to be a comprehensive comparative analysis. You do not have to address all three rhetorical appeals (though you can if you want to). It is sufficient to choose the greatest rhetorical strength of one author and compare it to how the other author used that same appeal. For example, if you think that King wins mostly on the back of his clear deductive logic, then you will compare this to Thoreau’s use of logic. If you think Thoreau wins because of his use of pathos in shaming his audience for not following their own consciences, then you will compare that to King’s use of pathos. And so on.
Requirements
Your response should address at least one rhetorical appeal and indicate how one author used it to greater effect than the other.
Your response should include at least two quotations. They may be both from the same author or one from each.
Your full response should be at least 10 sentences in length.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.